Difference between revisions of "Wireless Networking"

From LinuxMCE
Jump to: navigation, search
(Netbooting Wirelessly)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{versioninfo}}
 
{| align="right"
 
{| align="right"
 
   | __TOC__
 
   | __TOC__
 
   |}
 
   |}
[[Category:Hardware]]
+
[[Category:Networking|*Network Setup, Wireless]]
[[Category:Networking]]
+
  
 
==Wireless Access Points==
 
==Wireless Access Points==
Line 9: Line 9:
 
It is easiest to use a central switch for the LinuxMCE LAN, and connect that switch to the Core. The Core will then take care of the DHCP, firewall, DNS, and other network functions.
 
It is easiest to use a central switch for the LinuxMCE LAN, and connect that switch to the Core. The Core will then take care of the DHCP, firewall, DNS, and other network functions.
  
To allow wireless devices, a Wireless Access Point can be connected to the switch. Natutally, WEP/WPA/other security protocols are recommended for use between the Wireless Acess Point and wireless Devices.
+
To allow wireless devices, a Wireless Access Point can be connected to the switch. Naturally, WEP/WPA/other security protocols are recommended for use between the Wireless Access Point and wireless Devices.
  
 
==Wireless Routers==
 
==Wireless Routers==
Line 21: Line 21:
 
==Wireless Orbiters==
 
==Wireless Orbiters==
  
Fortunately, [[Orbiters]] do not require much bandwidth. Command data is quite small in size. Because the User Interface is [[Orbiter Generator|pre-rendered]], it is also small in size, and not much traffic between the Core and the Orbiters is required. You can use the Orbiters wirelessly no matter what Wireless Specification you use. Wireless-B (4.5-11 Mb/sec) is fine.
+
[[Orbiters]] do not require much bandwidth. Command data is quite small in size. Because the User Interface is [[Orbiter Generator|pre-rendered]], it is also small in size, and not much traffic between the Core and the Orbiters is required. You can use the Orbiters wirelessly no matter what Wireless Specification you use. Wireless-B (4.5-11 Mb/sec) is fine.
  
 
==Media Streaming over a Wireless connection==
 
==Media Streaming over a Wireless connection==
Line 35: Line 35:
 
==Netbooting Wirelessly==
 
==Netbooting Wirelessly==
  
Unless you have a wireless card with a PXE-ROM chip built into it, it is not easy to directly netboot  over a wireless connection. BIOS-based PXE algorithms usually only search for a wired NIC card to use  in a PXE netboot.  
+
Unless you have a wireless card with a PXE-ROM chip built into it, it is not easy to directly netboot  over a wireless connection. BIOS-based PXE algorithms usually only search for a wired NIC card to be used in a PXE [[netboot]].  
  
Some users have cleverly connected a "Wireless Bridge" (i.e. a wireless router or Access Point set to the "bridge" mode) to the wired NIC card in their PC. The PC then netboots through the wired Ethernet NIC as usual, but the data is then transmitted from the NIC to the Wireless AP/Router connected to it and then wirelessly "across the bridge" to the Wireless Access Point/Router that is connected to the Core.
+
Some users have cleverly connected a "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_bridge Wireless Bridge]" (i.e. a wireless router or Access Point set to the "bridge" mode) to the wired NIC card in their PC. The PC then netboots through the wired Ethernet NIC as usual, but the data is then transmitted from the NIC to the Wireless AP/Router connected to it and then wirelessly "across the bridge" to the Wireless Access Point/Router that is connected to the Core.
  
 
This solution works pretty well, but of course you must have two Wireless Access Points/Routers (one on each side of the "bridge"). These both should be Wireless-N (so you can have decent transmission speeds), and your costs will therefore start to increase. Still, this is sometimes easier than running extra Ethernet cables throughout your home.
 
This solution works pretty well, but of course you must have two Wireless Access Points/Routers (one on each side of the "bridge"). These both should be Wireless-N (so you can have decent transmission speeds), and your costs will therefore start to increase. Still, this is sometimes easier than running extra Ethernet cables throughout your home.
  
*[http://www.netgear.com/Products/APsWirelessControllers/AccessPoints/WNHDE111.aspx Netgear WNHDE111 Wireless-N Bridge] -- about $100 each in May 2008
+
*[http://www.netgear.com/Products/APsWirelessControllers/AccessPoints/WNHDE111.aspx Netgear WNHDE111 Wireless-N Bridge] -- about [http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00126V3EI $100] each in May 2008
 
*[http://www.smc.com/index.cfm?event=viewProduct&localeCode=EN_USA&cid=5&scid=126&pid=1635 SMCWEB-N EZ Connect™ N Pro Draft 11n Wireless Access Point/Ethernet Client] -- about [http://shopper.cnet.com/wireless-access-points/smc-ez-connect-n/4014-3265_9-32598043.html?tag=pdtl-list $99] each in May 2008
 
*[http://www.smc.com/index.cfm?event=viewProduct&localeCode=EN_USA&cid=5&scid=126&pid=1635 SMCWEB-N EZ Connect™ N Pro Draft 11n Wireless Access Point/Ethernet Client] -- about [http://shopper.cnet.com/wireless-access-points/smc-ez-connect-n/4014-3265_9-32598043.html?tag=pdtl-list $99] each in May 2008

Latest revision as of 12:34, 8 October 2012

Version Status Date Updated Updated By
710 Unknown N/A N/A
810 Unknown N/A N/A
1004 Unknown N/A N/A
1204 Unknown N/A N/A
1404 Unknown N/A N/A
Usage Information

Wireless Access Points

It is easiest to use a central switch for the LinuxMCE LAN, and connect that switch to the Core. The Core will then take care of the DHCP, firewall, DNS, and other network functions.

To allow wireless devices, a Wireless Access Point can be connected to the switch. Naturally, WEP/WPA/other security protocols are recommended for use between the Wireless Access Point and wireless Devices.

Wireless Routers

Wireless Routers can be used in place of both the switch and the Wireless Access Point. However, its DHCP and firewall functions will conflict with the Core's similar functions.

This is easy to prevent. Just don't use the WAN port of the wireless router. Plug the Core into one of the four or eight LAN ports of the wireless router. That will bypass the DHCP and router functions.

Fortunately, the Access Point functions will still work transparently, as if wireless devices were connected to the wireless router's LAN ports.

Wireless Orbiters

Orbiters do not require much bandwidth. Command data is quite small in size. Because the User Interface is pre-rendered, it is also small in size, and not much traffic between the Core and the Orbiters is required. You can use the Orbiters wirelessly no matter what Wireless Specification you use. Wireless-B (4.5-11 Mb/sec) is fine.

Media Streaming over a Wireless connection

Audio can be streamed over 10 Mb/sec speeds (Wireless-B, 4.5-11 Mb/sec) if there is no other network traffic. 54 Mb/sec speeds (Wireless-A or G, 23-54 Mb/sec) is usually adequate.

Video media streaming requires a fairly robust data transmission speed, however. 100 Mb/sec (Wireless-N, 74-300 Mb/sec) is usually the lowest tolerable speed, although sometimes 54 Mb speeds (Wireless-A or G, 23-54 Mb/sec) can suffice on a network with no other traffic.

(Compare wireless speeds to wired transmission speeds. Older wired LANs transmit at 100 Mb/sec and newer wired LANs use 1 Gigabit/sec.)

Therefore, if you are planning to routinely stream media over wireless, Wireless-N is the lowest speed recommended.

Netbooting Wirelessly

Unless you have a wireless card with a PXE-ROM chip built into it, it is not easy to directly netboot over a wireless connection. BIOS-based PXE algorithms usually only search for a wired NIC card to be used in a PXE netboot.

Some users have cleverly connected a "Wireless Bridge" (i.e. a wireless router or Access Point set to the "bridge" mode) to the wired NIC card in their PC. The PC then netboots through the wired Ethernet NIC as usual, but the data is then transmitted from the NIC to the Wireless AP/Router connected to it and then wirelessly "across the bridge" to the Wireless Access Point/Router that is connected to the Core.

This solution works pretty well, but of course you must have two Wireless Access Points/Routers (one on each side of the "bridge"). These both should be Wireless-N (so you can have decent transmission speeds), and your costs will therefore start to increase. Still, this is sometimes easier than running extra Ethernet cables throughout your home.