Difference between revisions of "Metcarob's Windows MCE vs Linux MCE Comparison"
From LinuxMCE
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
= Base Systems = | = Base Systems = | ||
| − | <table> | + | <table border=1 valign=top> |
<tr><th></th><th>Windows Media Centre</th><th>LinuxMCE</th></tr> | <tr><th></th><th>Windows Media Centre</th><th>LinuxMCE</th></tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Revision as of 13:27, 2 May 2009
I have both a Windows XP Media centre PC and a LinuxMCE PC set up in my living room attached to my TV. I am hoping to replace the windows Media centre PC but before I do this I need to ensure that LinuxMCE is up to the job of replacing it. I am hoping the LinuxMCE community will be able to assist me with advice on how to get LinuxMCE performing the way I want it. For this reason I have created this page comparing the two highlighting areas where the LinuxMCE set up is not currently living up to my requirements.
Base Systems
| Windows Media Centre | LinuxMCE | |
|---|---|---|
| Motherboard | ||
| Processor | ||
| RAM | ||
| Graphics Card | ||
| External Network Card | ||
| Internal Network Card | ||
| TV Capture Card 1 | Hauppauge WinTV Nova-T500 Dual Digital Tuner http://wiki.linuxmce.org/index.php/Hauppauge_WinTV-NOVA-T-500 Not the diversity model |
|
| TV Capture Card 2 | ||
| Hard Disk |
