Difference between revisions of "User talk:Langstonius"
Langstonius (Talk | contribs) |
Langstonius (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Hey Alx9r :) | Hey Alx9r :) | ||
I was thinking that we should eventually collapse them into one or the other, but im not sure which works best. I feel that for the moment, its fine because you also go into WAAAAAAY deeper detail than the average user setup. Looks good to me and thanks for adding that. Your letting me shame other users into adding their setups when I point to yours :) | I was thinking that we should eventually collapse them into one or the other, but im not sure which works best. I feel that for the moment, its fine because you also go into WAAAAAAY deeper detail than the average user setup. Looks good to me and thanks for adding that. Your letting me shame other users into adding their setups when I point to yours :) | ||
| − | [[User:Langstonius]] | + | --[[User:Langstonius|Langstonius]] 1:39, 21 June 2008 (PDT) |
Revision as of 21:39, 21 June 2008
I havent annoyed anyone yet with all the edits?
lol. I'm glad you have a sense of humor. I noticed you seem to be quietly categorizing the wiki -- thanks for the effort, I thinks it's a definite step in the right direction. Do you think "Category:Sample User Setups" ought to be obsoleted in favor of "Category:User Setups"? My page Alx9r's Sample Setup was in both, which looks awkward (i removed it from "Sample User Setups"). --Alx9r 11:59, 21 June 2008 (PDT)
Hey Alx9r :) I was thinking that we should eventually collapse them into one or the other, but im not sure which works best. I feel that for the moment, its fine because you also go into WAAAAAAY deeper detail than the average user setup. Looks good to me and thanks for adding that. Your letting me shame other users into adding their setups when I point to yours :) --Langstonius 1:39, 21 June 2008 (PDT)
